Comment On I'll take 94,249 please

It's time to add a new series called Error'd and retire a classic (Pop-up Potpourri). Like Pop-up Potpourri, Error'd will feature fun error messages and other visual oddities from the world of IT. But instead of being a monthly feature, Error'd will be published every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. And as always, don't hesitate to send in your own Error'd screenshots and photos. [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:02 • by Saladin
and retire a classic (Pop-Up Potpourri)

What? Nooooooo! Those were the best part of the site.

EDIT: Well, three times a week kind of makes up for it, I guess, but it was still nice having 10+ WTFs in one big post once in a while. I guess I could get used to the change :)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:10 • by travisowens
I actually prefer the new style of having more frequent posts on TheDailyWTF with lesser content, I'd rather have 3 "Error'd" posts a week than one big one.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:11 • by Joel (unregistered)
You may not want to click even if you're on a high speed connection. My Firefox process is now bloated out to a mem size of about 311MB.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:11 • by H3SO5
Not first.

And I agree, 3 times a week is better.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:13 • by Pap
The Real WTF™ is that the quantity limit (of 99,999) seems to be coded into the page itself by this tag:

<input type="hidden" name="maap_bb_qty_limit" value="99999" />

So if you need more than 99,999, be sure to modify that tag in the page source before submitting your order.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:13 • by Stooge (unregistered)
Wow. So, I put 99999.

Comes out to around 4.4 million dollars.

And with a shipping weight of around 8.8 ounces each, it's 55 thousand pounds (27.5 thousand tons).

I wonder how many truckloads that is...

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:14 • by shaeffer (unregistered)
119590 in reply to 119578
Saladin:
What? Nooooooo! Those were the best part of the site.

EDIT: Well, three times a week kind of makes up for it, I guess, but it was still nice having 10+ WTFs in one big post once in a while. I guess I could get used to the change :)


I agree - and the name sounds like someone is a fan of Strong Bad :)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:17 • by JF (unregistered)
119592 in reply to 119589
Stooge:
Wow. So, I put 99999.

Comes out to around 4.4 million dollars.

And with a shipping weight of around 8.8 ounces each, it's 55 thousand pounds (27.5 thousand tons).

I wonder how many truckloads that is...


I'll let you know, I just ordered 50,000 bottles but it's currently on back order...

Captcha : doom (it was doomsday for Firefox when I tried loading the page...)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:26 • by Billy Bob Jamie Joe Hickboy (unregistered)
Good grief... freaking use a textfield.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:41 • by Jimmy (unregistered)
119613 in reply to 119592
If you had applied for the Amazon.com Visa, you would have saved $30, making your total only $2,184,470.00

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:41 • by janey (unregistered)
Who wouldnt want that? ;-)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:42 • by Matthew (unregistered)
Agreed! Quantity is better than quality!

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:45 • by Anonymous Coward (unregistered)
The real WTF is it's individual pills, not bottles. Each one is shrink wrapped to a piece of cardboard with a coupon for TurboTax and an ad for Spider-Man 3.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:52 • by Neil (unregistered)
Your current subtotal: $4,368,956.31
Amazon.com Visa savings: -$30.00 <--------- LOL
Your cost after savings: $4,368,926.31

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:53 • by FlyboyFred (unregistered)
119622 in reply to 119589
55,000 pounds would be about one full truckload and part of another. An 18-wheeler usually has a payload of about 45,000 pounds.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 15:57 • by Glenn Lasher (unregistered)
119624 in reply to 119592
And with a shipping weight of around 8.8 ounces each, it's 55 thousand pounds (27.5 thousand tons).


Erm... I think you meant 27.5 tons, not 27.5 thousand tons....

The real WTF is that we are still not using the metric system.

Also, testing the CAPTCHA breakage.... I should be typing "tacos" but I am instead typing "iamnotarobot". Let's see if it believes me.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:03 • by PS (unregistered)
Still, it makes for an amazing background...



*(disclaimer: this is not a blatant ripoff of another topic, it's an hommage)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:03 • by Khanmots (unregistered)
119631 in reply to 119584
Joel:
You may not want to click even if you're on a high speed connection. My Firefox process is now bloated out to a mem size of about 311MB.


Whereas after opening that my Opera process is sitting at 105MB with around 70 other tabs open...

Just couldn't resist the chance for a jab. :)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:12 • by CrankyPants (unregistered)
119634 in reply to 119631
Khanmots:
Opera . . . with around 70 other tabs open...


Sorry, but that's the real WTF!

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:14 • by dkf (unregistered)
119636 in reply to 119622
FlyboyFred:
55,000 pounds would be about one full truckload and part of another. An 18-wheeler usually has a payload of about 45,000 pounds.


Do they have the option of sending it in a 40ft shipping container? Those things can take 26,500 kg of content, which should be enough, assuming they can squash it all in...

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:24 • by Laie Techie (unregistered)
119642 in reply to 119584
My Firefox only used 85MB when I loaded that page (of course it hogged half my CPU, though).

Remember the days when the whole operating system took less than 1MB memory?

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:27 • by Kumachan (unregistered)
119643 in reply to 119585
H3SO5:
Not first.

And I agree, 3 times a week is better.


Yes, my wife says the same thing

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:29 • by jim (unregistered)
119645 in reply to 119624
test :)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:32 • by Anon (unregistered)
119647 in reply to 119643
Kumachan:
H3SO5:
Not first.

And I agree, 3 times a week is better.


Yes, my wife says the same thing


Yeah, your wife says that to me all the time.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:41 • by Jethris (unregistered)
119650 in reply to 119647
Anon:
Kumachan:
H3SO5:
Not first.

And I agree, 3 times a week is better.


Yes, my wife says the same thing


Yeah, your wife says that to me all the time.


Okay, that was just wrong... Unless it's the same day/same time?


Captcha (because I can put in anything I want): condoms

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:44 • by Anon (unregistered)
119652 in reply to 119647
Yeah, well your wife just said it to me

captcha: tesla (coil it)

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:45 • by midiwall
Dern it! They cap out the actual cart contents at 999 items!

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:46 • by Shirley U. Geste (unregistered)
119654 in reply to 119642
Laie Techie:
Remember the days when the whole operating system took less than 1MB memory?
ITYM "8KB". That left 56KB for the programs. It was a multi-user, multi-tasking OS, too. An 8-bit MU/MT OS.

-Shirley

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 16:57 • by codemoose
119658 in reply to 119631
Khanmots:
Joel:
You may not want to click even if you're on a high speed connection. My Firefox process is now bloated out to a mem size of about 311MB.


Whereas after opening that my Opera process is sitting at 105MB with around 70 other tabs open...

Just couldn't resist the chance for a jab. :)


What's up with that? My Firefox 2 process is only at 125MB, and that's with three other tabs that have been open all day.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 17:02 • by aikii
Funny, I thought firefox had a memory leak. Open the page, close it. On mac os x, firefox2 takes about 180Mb at this point. Open it again, then look at the source ( sloooowwww ... it needs to parse it a second time for the syntax highlight ). It takes 360Mb on my system. Then I closed the page and tried a dummy php script that generates a select with 100000 options. Memory taken by firefox doesn't grow up but it doesn't seem to free that space either. My guess is a really lazy garbage collector. But hey, I don't complain, it works great and smoothly in "normal" situations, and is still alive after that experience. I don't know about IE, but I had to kill safari ...

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 17:11 • by midiwall
119664 in reply to 119654
Shirley U. Geste:
Laie Techie:
Remember the days when the whole operating system took less than 1MB memory?
ITYM "8KB". That left 56KB for the programs. It was a multi-user, multi-tasking OS, too. An 8-bit MU/MT OS.

-Shirley
Yeup... I was there too.

I also used to code in 256 BYTES of memory.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 17:13 • by Otto
119665 in reply to 119653
midiwall:
Dern it! They cap out the actual cart contents at 999 items!



And you didn't even qualify for the free Super Saver Shipping? What a rip-off!

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 17:15 • by Frzr (unregistered)
I'm still waiting for IE6 to load that page... 56MB and counting. CPU at 100% for the past half hour.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 17:26 • by Tweenk
Gosh, I had to kill my Firefox when I opened this one. My laptop has 256 MB of mem only :/, and FF took 152 MB when I killed it. Anybody entering this site is in fact subjected to a browser DoS attack! Now that's Marketing 2.0. Those memory pills are intended for the user's browser I think :D
I guess larger FF memory usage is because the select box is a XUL component in FF, but a regular system control in IE and some other browsers. Installed extensions can be a factor, too.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 18:01 • by appleshampoo (unregistered)
119683 in reply to 119665
That's because the pills aren't actually sold by Amazon.com, but by some third-party..

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 18:12 • by Jackal von ÖRF
119690 in reply to 119631
Khanmots:
Joel:
You may not want to click even if you're on a high speed connection. My Firefox process is now bloated out to a mem size of about 311MB.

Whereas after opening that my Opera process is sitting at 105MB with around 70 other tabs open...

I used to use Opera from version 3.6x until 6 or something. It can handle lots and lots of tabs faster than Firefox (which I use now), let alone IE. But ironically, this was also the reason why I stopped using Opera.

I had a habbit of minimizing windows when I wanted to revisit them some days later, because Opera always restored the windows which were open when Opera was closed, and having a couple dozen windows open up in the startup did not slow down Opera even a bit. I used minimized windows a bit like short-term bookmarks. The problem was, that all those minimized windows little by little begun to be a mental burden to me - it's like having a desk full of papers from unfinished work.

So I switched from Opera to Firefox, because Firefox does not encourage me to have tens of tabs open up when I start up the browser. This is the real WTF.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 18:46 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
119705 in reply to 119634
CrankyPants:
Khanmots:
Opera . . . with around 70 other tabs open...


Sorry, but that's the real WTF!

I regularly have far more open than that, as the lack of a noticable performance problem combined with auto-restoring of open tabs when you restart opera makes it very easy to end up with hundreds of open pages. I do agree it's almost a bad thing, though, as it forces me to regularly go through the piles of pages I have open "for reading later" and clean them up.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 19:21 • by ccanni1028 (unregistered)
119721 in reply to 119653
Important Messages
We're sorry. You've requested more of Cogni-Flex Phos.Serine+(60Capsules) Brand: Jarrow, than the 999 available from the seller you've selected. Click here to return to the product detail page and see if additional quantities are available from another seller.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 20:29 • by peon (unregistered)
119743 in reply to 119578
Saladin:
and retire a classic (Pop-Up Potpourri)

What? Nooooooo! Those were the best part of the site.

EDIT: Well, three times a week kind of makes up for it, I guess, but it was still nice having [the pictures] in one big post once in a while. I guess I could get used to the change :)


Oddly, some people said the same when foosball girl was replaced by beanbag girl...

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 20:40 • by Peabody (unregistered)
119746 in reply to 119589
Stooge:
Wow. So, I put 99999.

Comes out to around 4.4 million dollars.

And with a shipping weight of around 8.8 ounces each, it's 55 thousand pounds (27.5 thousand tons).

I wonder how many truckloads that is...


Only about two truckloads actually. You could maybe even cram it all onto one big truck.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 20:50 • by steve-o (unregistered)
Important Message

We're sorry. You've requested more of
Cogni-Flex Phos.Serine+(60Capsules) Brand: Jarrow,
than the 999 available from the seller you've selected.

Click here to return to the product detail page and see if additional quantities are available from another seller.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 21:52 • by guest (unregistered)
The real WTF is that whoever got the original screenshot believes this kind of pills works.

I guess they think if you are dumb enough to buy one bottle, you may be gullible enough to buy 9999.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 22:53 • by anonymous (unregistered)
119790 in reply to 119705
in FF 2, go to Edit, Preferences, Main, "When firefox starts" select "Show my windows and tabs from last time".
Now FF saves where you were too.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 23:22 • by cklam
Hilarious !

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-12 23:24 • by cklam
119806 in reply to 119589
Stooge:
Wow. So, I put 99999.

Comes out to around 4.4 million dollars.

And with a shipping weight of around 8.8 ounces each, it's 55 thousand pounds (27.5 thousand tons).

I wonder how many truckloads that is...


One. They'll put it all into a 40-foot container and then send the truck around ....

Addendum (2007-02-12 23:33):
On second thought: the stuff may not fit volume wise into one container since pill packages are usually low-density and take up a lot of volume compared to high density load items like for example machinery.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-13 03:37 • by Hawk777
119854 in reply to 119774
Nah, that's not gullible. They buy one bottle "just to try them out", come back a week later, and forgot they ordered the first bottle...

guest:
The real WTF is that whoever got the original screenshot believes this kind of pills works.

I guess they think if you are dumb enough to buy one bottle, you may be gullible enough to buy 9999.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-13 03:58 • by Quincy5
119859 in reply to 119670
Tweenk:
Gosh, I had to kill my Firefox when I opened this one. My laptop has 256 MB of mem only :/, and FF took 152 MB when I killed it. Anybody entering this site is in fact subjected to a browser DoS attack! Now that's Marketing 2.0. Those memory pills are intended for the user's browser I think :D
I guess larger FF memory usage is because the select box is a XUL component in FF, but a regular system control in IE and some other browsers. Installed extensions can be a factor, too.


I had to kill FF as well. I think this 'attack' is a far larger WTF than the original one with the drop-down box.

Re: I'll take 94,249 please (If The Page Loaded, I Would!)

2007-02-13 03:59 • by Darryl Drury (unregistered)
119860 in reply to 119666
I'M Running IE6 On A Works Machine (NO CHOICE!), I Gave Up After 15Mins, Cpu @ 100% Mem Usage At 256, The Thing Running Like A Two Legged Whippet - I'M Pissed Because I Couldn't Get To The Source Code

This Sort Of Thing Should Be Made Illegal:
http://www.amazon.com/Cogni-Flex-Phos-Serine%2B-60Capsules-Brand-Jarrow/dp/B0002DULV8/sr=8-6/qid=1171356685/ref=sr_1_6/103-9965862-1575058?ie=UTF8&s=hpc

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-13 04:35 • by Nero (unregistered)
Whoah! It almost blown up my Firefox on the dual-core 3GHz machine!

Anyway, I also prefer to read more frequent posts. But let the old title stay! I liked it!

Re: I'll take 94,249 please

2007-02-13 05:18 • by XIU
119872 in reply to 119860
Darryl Drury:
I'M Running IE6 On A Works Machine (NO CHOICE!), I Gave Up After 15Mins, Cpu @ 100% Mem Usage At 256, The Thing Running Like A Two Legged Whippet - I'M Pissed Because I Couldn't Get To The Source Code

This Sort Of Thing Should Be Made Illegal:
http://www.amazon.com/Cogni-Flex-Phos-Serine%2B-60Capsules-Brand-Jarrow/dp/B0002DULV8/sr=8-6/qid=1171356685/ref=sr_1_6/103-9965862-1575058?ie=UTF8&s=hpc


Something Wrong With Your Shift-Key?
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment