Comment On This Button Is Impossible

So here's what I'm wondering: if Ben checks the box, what does it do? If he unchecks it what does it do? [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1Next »

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:09 • by a person (unregistered)
How is KDE even running on 3 MHz?

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:09 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
The VMware one of course means estimated processing speed within the VM...

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:10 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
The VMware one of course means estimated processing speed within the VM...

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:16 • by Loonacy (unregistered)
I've received that error in VMWare on my laptop. The problem was my CPUs were idle and so they had clocked themselves down. The fix was to either set the CPUs' clock speed manually or to run a CPU intensive program while starting VMWare.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:36 • by Stefan (unregistered)
So really, Walter F. is from Romania eh?

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:38 • by James Stanley (unregistered)
204702 in reply to 204696
a person:
How is KDE even running on 3 MHz?

That is the worse than failure. It isn't 3 MHz.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:41 • by Erik (unregistered)
The funny thing is, I've gotten that same exact message from ING several times.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:46 • by Phill
204706 in reply to 204699
Loonacy:
I've received that error in VMWare on my laptop. The problem was my CPUs were idle and so they had clocked themselves down. The fix was to either set the CPUs' clock speed manually or to run a CPU intensive program while starting VMWare.


Wow... what version of SpeedStep allows your processor to be slowed to a couple of MHz?

AFAIK, slowing a 1.5GHz chip to 0.5GHz would be about the best you'd get.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:47 • by jnareb
About MKS Source Reporter

It looks for me like Walter F. doesn't have any version of Access installed. Nevertheless installer should show an error instead of single "choice" of not installing MKS Source Reporter. I guess that this dialog is after a loong, loong configuring installation options?


Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 08:52 • by GLaDoS (unregistered)
This next button is impossible; make no attempt to understand it.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 09:03 • by Random832
204711 in reply to 204706
Phill:
Loonacy:
I've received that error in VMWare on my laptop. The problem was my CPUs were idle and so they had clocked themselves down. The fix was to either set the CPUs' clock speed manually or to run a CPU intensive program while starting VMWare.


Wow... what version of SpeedStep allows your processor to be slowed to a couple of MHz?

AFAIK, slowing a 1.5GHz chip to 0.5GHz would be about the best you'd get.


Right - VMware thinks you have a crappy (500MHz) processor, so it thinks your VMware performance will be about 3MHz.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 09:11 • by RNH (unregistered)
The REAL WTF is MKS!

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 09:21 • by Wickerman (unregistered)
204716 in reply to 204714
RNH:
The REAL WTF is MKS!


You should've said it like: "TRWTF? MKS!" then it would've totally been in acronyms.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 09:26 • by yaff
204719 in reply to 204703
Erik:
The funny thing is, I've gotten that same exact message from ING several times.


It's also the corporate combination to ING-branded luggage.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 09:34 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
204720 in reply to 204716
Wickerman:
RNH:
The REAL WTF is MKS!


You should've said it like: "TRWTF? MKS!" then it would've totally been in acronyms.

Being totally in acronyms wouldn't have been: TRWTFIMKS?

captcha: transverbero... quite!

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 10:00 • by Zecc
204729 in reply to 204696
a person:
How is KDE even running on 3 MHz?
Slowly.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 10:08 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
First post!

(Made using KDE on a 3MHz processor)

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 10:36 • by valerion
It may only be 3Mhz but it's got 1000 cores.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 10:59 • by Anon (unregistered)
204743 in reply to 204696
He said KDE, not Vista Aero.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 12:06 • by Erik (unregistered)
204757 in reply to 204716
Wickerman:
RNH:
The REAL WTF is MKS!


You should've said it like: "TRWTF? MKS!" then it would've totally been in acronyms.


LOL, ITA!

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 12:20 • by savar
204760 in reply to 204699
Loonacy:
I've received that error in VMWare on my laptop. The problem was my CPUs were idle and so they had clocked themselves down. The fix was to either set the CPUs' clock speed manually or to run a CPU intensive program while starting VMWare.


The comcast installer used to do this too. I never install the CD junk they give you, but a friend of mine got service and he had to play a movie in the background before he could start the installer.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 12:23 • by lolwtf
Either that or his CPU speed is ~4,294,968,296hz, i.e. ~4.3ghz.

The real WTF is voluntarily installing something from Macrovision.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 12:45 • by fluffy (unregistered)
The ING Direct thing isn't actually an error, if that was the customer's first transaction. Rather than doing a large randomly-generated (or, even worse, globally-incrementing) confirmation ID, ING just provides each customer with their own confirmation number pool. TRWTF(tm) is that everyone is so used to asininely large and immemorable confirmation numbers that to see something so simple looks like an error.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 13:21 • by Padraic D. (unregistered)
Ooooh, that means he can write terms of service like:

"All ValuePoint customers receive free service for one year." Or fifty. Or, you know, whatever.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 13:32 • by Brian White (unregistered)
204767 in reply to 204762
fluffy:
The ING Direct thing isn't actually an error, if that was the customer's first transaction. Rather than doing a large randomly-generated (or, even worse, globally-incrementing) confirmation ID, ING just provides each customer with their own confirmation number pool. TRWTF(tm) is that everyone is so used to asininely large and immemorable confirmation numbers that to see something so simple looks like an error.


Then the real WTF was using a zero-based index for a customer facing application.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 14:27 • by brodie
204770 in reply to 204762
fluffy:
The ING Direct thing isn't actually an error, if that was the customer's first transaction. Rather than doing a large randomly-generated (or, even worse, globally-incrementing) confirmation ID, ING just provides each customer with their own confirmation number pool. TRWTF(tm) is that everyone is so used to asininely large and immemorable confirmation numbers that to see something so simple looks like an error.

Yeah, I was a little surprised when my last transfer had a confirmation number of "12," but I figured it was just user-specific, instead of global.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 14:50 • by Otterdam
The real WTF is nobody noticed Jake spelled Justyn's name wrong. Are the pedants still at work?

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 15:01 • by Tim Ward (unregistered)
C'mon, MKS is full of much better error messages than that! My favourite was a message box simply containing the text "-1".

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 16:51 • by Arenzael
WOW, ING is doing so well that they just rolled their odometer over!

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 16:57 • by AdT (unregistered)
204784 in reply to 204711
Random832:
Right - VMware thinks you have a crappy (500MHz) processor, so it thinks your VMware performance will be about 3MHz.


Still makes no sense. The typical virtualized CPU performance on a late Pentium or Core, or earlier Athlon, is at least 30% of the non-virtualized performance.

On a Core 2 with VT or an Athlon with AMD-V, it's close to 100%. Graphics performance still suffers quite a bit, though.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 18:01 • by Nazca
204787 in reply to 204708
GLaDoS:
This next button is impossible; make no attempt to understand it.


Congratulations on succeeding in an atmosphere of extreme pessimism.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 18:43 • by Eternal Density
204790 in reply to 204787
Nazca:
GLaDoS:
This next button is impossible; make no attempt to understand it.


Congratulations on succeeding in an atmosphere of extreme pessimism.
The comment is a lie.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 18:50 • by Zemm
204791 in reply to 204773
Otterdam:
The real WTF is nobody noticed Jake spelled Justyn's name wrong. Are the pedants still at work?


I just got to work and was about to point out Justin vs Justyn

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 19:14 • by IV (unregistered)
204793 in reply to 204765
Padraic D.:
Ooooh, that means he can write terms of service like:

"All ValuePoint customers receive free service for one year." Or fifty. Or, you know, whatever.

All fifty ValuePoint customers receive free service for one year? Isn't that kind of dissing the product before you really try it?

I would put something more fun there. Something completely out there for future people. Maybe all subsequent users give up their firstborn to Microsoft unless they have a special government exemption.

And MKS is absolutely horrible, at least for large companies.

Captcha: enim

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 19:37 • by daniel c w
What's a good way to measure the CPU performance anyway?

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 20:03 • by You didn't ignore it did you? (unregistered)
Ignore this comment

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 20:50 • by tin
I wish my XT clone had a VGA adapter... But all I have is a lame CGA card. Though it does have a TV out connector :p

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 21:01 • by Spartan
Walter F. writes "...makes me think of the communist era (I'm from Romania) when people had the freedom to vote for the only presidential candidate."


Wow, you actually got to mark the ballot Walter F? You mean it wasn't already marked for you? [sarcasm]The Soviet Union must have been getting soft giving you so much more choice.[/sarcasm]

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-07 22:51 • by Boris Johnson (unregistered)
204799 in reply to 204740
valerion:
It may only be 3Mhz but it's got 1000 cores.


That makes bugger-all difference to the speed, of course.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 00:21 • by cklam (unregistered)
204803 in reply to 204798
Spartan:
Walter F. writes "...makes me think of the communist era (I'm from Romania) when people had the freedom to vote for the only presidential candidate."


Wow, you actually got to mark the ballot Walter F? You mean it wasn't already marked for you? [sarcasm]The Soviet Union must have been getting soft giving you so much more choice.[/sarcasm]


Usually an unmarked paper ballot was considered a valid vote in communist elections. It was interpreted as a vote for the communist party/candidate/election ticket.

In communist countries where there were not-really-alternatives (like the "block parties" in former Eastern Germany) the voter had mark the ballot only if he intended to vote for one of the "alternatives". As the voter had to mark the ballot in open view (no vating booths for you in Eastern German elections) anyone could observe him doing so. Anyone of course included primarily the Ministry for State Security .....

CAPTCHA: tristique - how qppropriate

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 01:14 • by sysKin (unregistered)
Actually, that 3 GHz might even be a real wtf-grade bug:

int system_speed = GetClocksPerSecond();

if (system_speed < 500000000) {
// slower that 500 MHz, complain
GUI_complain(system_speed);
}

...where GUI_complain takes system_speed as an unsigned integer.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 04:20 • by The Wizard (unregistered)
Pay no attention to that button behind the curtain

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 08:53 • by d000hg (unregistered)
204823 in reply to 204767
Brian White:
fluffy:
The ING Direct thing isn't actually an error, if that was the customer's first transaction. Rather than doing a large randomly-generated (or, even worse, globally-incrementing) confirmation ID, ING just provides each customer with their own confirmation number pool. TRWTF(tm) is that everyone is so used to asininely large and immemorable confirmation numbers that to see something so simple looks like an error.


Then the real WTF was using a zero-based index for a customer facing application.
Why?

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 11:49 • by Voting Machine (unregistered)
204926 in reply to 204803
cklam:
Usually an unmarked paper ballot was considered a valid vote in communist elections. It was interpreted as a vote for the communist party/candidate/election ticket.

In communist countries where there were not-really-alternatives (like the "block parties" in former Eastern Germany) the voter had mark the ballot only if he intended to vote for one of the "alternatives". As the voter had to mark the ballot in open view (no vating booths for you in Eastern German elections) anyone could observe him doing so. Anyone of course included primarily the Ministry for State Security .....
Not quite true, technically.

There was a voting booth in East German elections, but since you obviously didn't have to go to the voting booth in order to NOT mark the ballot, anyone could observe you going to the voting booth, and deduce that you were probably intending to (shock! horror!) actually mark the ballot.

Voting Integrity Client 2006

2008-07-08 11:55 • by Voting Machine (unregistered)
For some reason, though, that MKS Integrity Client dialog box looks to me like a communist ballot on which the default choice would be to NOT vote for the only candidate. I highly doubt they would have done it that way in Romania.

This ballot is impossible...

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 12:56 • by reefdog (unregistered)
204952 in reply to 204823
Because non-progammers don't understand 0 is a valid starting point, and since (as fluffy pointed out) their user-specific transaction IDs are a feature, it makes sense to go the whole nine yards with it.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 16:30 • by ClaudeSuck.de
205011 in reply to 204803
cklam:

CAPTCHA: tristique - how qppropriate


AZERTY keyboard?

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-08 22:14 • by Nazca
205074 in reply to 204790
Eternal Density:
Nazca:
GLaDoS:
This next button is impossible; make no attempt to understand it.


Congratulations on succeeding in an atmosphere of extreme pessimism.
The comment is a lie.

Well just keep on trying til you run out of cake.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-13 02:23 • by spelling nazi (unregistered)
205808 in reply to 204706
Phill:
Wow... what version of SpeedStep allows your processor to be slowed to a couple of MHz?

AFAIK, slowing a 1.5GHz chip to 0.5GHz would be about the best you'd get.


The processor's starting speed was 1.003 GHz, clearly.

Re: This Button Is Impossible

2008-07-18 04:06 • by Raithlin (unregistered)
206873 in reply to 204757
Erik:
Wickerman:
RNH:
The REAL WTF is MKS!


You should've said it like: "TRWTF? MKS!" then it would've totally been in acronyms.


LOL, ITA!


The scary thing is I am actually able to follow the conversation!!
« PrevPage 1Next »

Add Comment