|
|
|
| Non-WTF Job: C++ Developer at Good Grievance (Ronkonkoma, NY) |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Next » |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 09:04
•
by
A Nonny Mouse
(unregistered)
|
|
where o where has my little 'where' gone...? oh and all my effiency
how do these people pass themselves off as programmers. honestly. |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 09:40
•
by
H|B
(unregistered)
|
|
Perhaps they were totally afraid of SQL injections?
|
|
The best bit is not the lack of WHERE - that's just an optimisation after all. The best bit is the way after he finds the matching entry he keeps on going... and immediately de-authenticates on the first following non-matching entry.
Adding a WHERE clause so there's only ever one record returned would conceal, rather than fix, this bug. The dangers of premature optimisation! |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 09:44
•
by
beyondthislife
(unregistered)
|
|
Slow, and unless they were the last user in the database, they'd never get authenticated either....
|
|
People should be able to contract STDs from writing bad code.
|
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 10:16
•
by
Loren Pechtel
(unregistered)
|
How? When is the last time you actually used a serial port for anything? And what other communications system stars with an S? At least the captcha is on target: sanitarium |
|
Add a break statement and you've got yourself some enterprisey code right there.
|
|
I blame the unit test, procedures should always be tested with multiple variables.
|
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 10:53
•
by
akatherder
|
I'll pay bums to go around sticking programmers with dirty needles. There may be some collateral damage, but that just makes it funnier. |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 11:14
•
by
J
(unregistered)
|
|
No default value is set. If the user table ever gets truncated,
this.authenticated = FILE NOT FOUND; |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 11:18
•
by
Kinglink
(unregistered)
|
AHHH yes, this is what I noticed too and it was quite delightful. Captcha: Doom, such as what this program should bring. |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 11:42
•
by
He Who Must Not Be Named
(unregistered)
|
|
Even better is that it's going to hold a read lock onto every row, so there is addition concurrency issues w/o:
source.Close() |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-09 19:17
•
by
chrismcb
|
So are you suggesting that they might have multiple rows with identical user names but different passwords? |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-10 03:05
•
by
Theo
(unregistered)
|
|
A real unit-test should not go to the database anyway. It should use a mocked datasource.
|
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-10 05:18
•
by
SQB
(unregistered)
|
|
Am I the only one who feels that
this.authenticated = (source["user"].ToString() == username && source["pass"].ToString() == passhash);would be cleaner? |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-10 06:14
•
by
Alien426
(unregistered)
|
|
Am I the only one who wonders how many fields the table "users" has? Why do people still generally query all the data, even columns they don't ever need?
|
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-10 07:48
•
by
Thorin
(unregistered)
|
Does it really matter how "clean" it is if it only works when there's a single user of the system? |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2007-05-10 15:33
•
by
Student
(unregistered)
|
Happened to me today. Tested on windows server worked fine but inmmediatly segfaulted on Linux. Seems Linux's strdup() don't check if you pass it a NULL pointer. PD: yes, it was more or less finished the night before and i'm also expecting the TA doesn't notice some code doesn't work) |
Re: Classics Week: But It Worked in the Demo
2008-06-10 08:56
•
by
EagleErnie
(unregistered)
|
|
If he makes a proper ORDER statement, he will probably get it working no matter how many users in the table?
|
| « Prev | Page 1 | Next » |