Comment On Chocolate Covered SQL

Matt M, there is no dialog there. You see nothing ... [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 10:41 • by Owen Rudge (unregistered)
I find the juxtaposition of the "retard" word and the little disability icon somewhat ironic...

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 10:42 • by ParkinT
The Chocolate Covered Raisins and SQL?
WTF?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 10:47 • by SpComb
The MozillaWiki one is still live

The third one is the best pop-up potpourri ever!

The FAQ one is old though

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 10:47 • by fennec
112125 in reply to 112121
ParkinT:
The Chocolate Covered Raisins and SQL?
WTF?

Presumably, whatever process they had to generate the text that was going to be printed on the bag was driven by some sort of SQL database. This makes perfect sense.

As for a statement about 'equipment', I think it was probably a warning about whether this was made with equipment that also processes peanut products, or something like that.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 10:51 • by orudge (unregistered)
112126 in reply to 112125
fennec:
As for a statement about 'equipment', I think it was probably a warning about whether this was made with equipment that also processes peanut products, or something like that.


Although that line was indeed on the next line. ;)

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 10:55 • by Gareth Martin (unregistered)
112127 in reply to 112124
SpComb:
The MozillaWiki one is still live


The number equals 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFDA0 in hex, or -608 (I think?) when interpreted as a signed twos complement 64-bit number instead of an unsigned one.

Still, a negative number of real pages?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 10:57 • by Maarten (unregistered)
This is what happens if you use 'select *'.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:01 • by Sish (unregistered)
The last wtf reminds me of http://www.helldeskforum.com/vid_printout.shtml.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:03 • by PittSammy
The RealWTF(tm) with the last one is that they didn't take a picture of the printout of the error on a wooden table, print that out and fax it.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:15 • by Saladin
A Pop-Up Potpourri and it's not even Friday?!

I'm not complaining. I love these things. Thanks for making them more frequent, Alex :D

Addendum (2007-01-18 11:23):
Regarding the raisins WTF, that's probably the funniest one I've ever seen -- actually making it into the real world in a form other than a messed-up computer readout or web site misprint. Classic. It's my wallpaper for now.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:15 • by GoatCheez
The irony in this last message (sent in by John) is that it was received via interoffice mail and is a photocopy of a fax of a printed screenshot. The "Send Report" manages to do the same thing, though a bit more efficiently ...

They did it wrong! You're supposed to take a photo of the screen, take the film to get it developed, THEN photocopy it! C'mon now!!!

Insert a wooden table at the appropriate step as well for better results lol...

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:16 • by not so sure (unregistered)
112138 in reply to 112133
PittSammy:
The RealWTF(tm) with the last one is that they didn't take a picture of the printout of the error on a wooden table, print that out and fax it.

How do you know they didn't?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:30 • by Sgt. Zim
112141 in reply to 112125
fennec:
As for a statement about 'equipment', I think it was probably a warning about whether this was made with equipment that also processes peanut products, or something like that.

With the prevalence of peanut (and other) allergies, these are becoming much more common, at least here in the States.

My favorite was the frozen entreé of "Thai-style Peanut Chicken (in Peanut Sauce)" ... Which included the warning that it was produced on machines that "also process peanuts".

I'll have to find another one of those, put it on a wooden table, photograph it, and submit it as a sidebar...

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:31 • by n (unregistered)
This makes me laugh so hard, I almost cry. God, I can't get enough of pop-up potpourri! As the CAPTCHA says, it's "yummy".

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:37 • by Mark (unregistered)
The raisin one is FAKE!

Every other line on the bag is perfectly centered. The SQL one is about 2 characters to the right. Even if this were to happen, the text would still be centered. Photoshop anyone?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:40 • by wolfy (unregistered)
112148 in reply to 112124
SpComb:
The MozillaWiki one is still live

The third one is the best pop-up potpourri ever!

The FAQ one is old though


What I also like about the MozillaWiki is the break-down of the user-to-admin ratio :o)

currently:

"There are 15,755 registered users, of which 31 (or 0.20%) are administrators"

I mean, who really cares how many *percent* of the users are administrators? Or is it some kind of competition?

"yo, check this, nearly 0.2 out of one hundred users are admins!"

That's about one leg I'd think... ;o)

Also, given that 18,446,744,073,709,551,053 pages are online and there were 13,256,197 page views, only one page in 1.391.556.271.659 (or about one in 1.3 trillion) pages has ever been viewed. *SO* much left to read....

captcha: doom (with matching background colours.... ;o)

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:47 • by dan s. (unregistered)
112149 in reply to 112146
Mark:
The raisin one is FAKE!


Party pooper! We haven't had this fun in the office since... well I don't know.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 11:52 • by kwyjibo (unregistered)
What the fuck? That's not from World of Warcraft.

I don't know why you would say it is! All of WoW's EULA's appear in-game only with their custom GUI.

I guess you make these up and ignore legitimate submissions. Why? And don't tell me this was to anonymize the submission, because you used another company and made them look bad instead, potentially incurring a lawsuit.

Why pass up true stories for fake ones, when the truth is more entertaining, when your viewers come here falsely believing they'll see the real deal, and when they submit content hoping to share it with others?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 12:06 • by hpeg (unregistered)
So far I've had:

- Screenshots in Word. [fine]
- Screenshots in Excel. [weird]
- 4500x6000 px TIFFs of scanned printouts. [ugh]
- Screenshots printed out, then marked with a pen, scanned in and turned into a PDF. [oh-kay]

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 12:20 • by e@v (unregistered)
112156 in reply to 112151
Wrong, mister Fly-off-the-handle-and-start-making-up-shit-yourself-too.

I get that EULA corruption every time i reinstall / upgrade WoW. It happens when you run world of warcraft in wine (or winex, or cedega, or whatever you want to call it.) on a linux machine.

You obviously have an axe to grind, but don't make up your own facts. This is a legitimate pop-up.

I hereby invalidate your post. Better luck next time.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 12:26 • by brazzy
112157 in reply to 112136
Saladin:
Regarding the raisins WTF, that's probably the funniest one I've ever seen -- actually making it into the real world in a form other than a messed-up computer readout or web site misprint. Classic. It's my wallpaper for now.

Yesterday's caricatures are today's reality:


The text on they guy's back reads "Error: could not find file 'dragonhead.jpg'"

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 12:34 • by not so sure (unregistered)
112160 in reply to 112156
e@v:
Wrong, mister Fly-off-the-handle-and-start-making-up-shit-yourself-too.

I get that EULA corruption every time i reinstall / upgrade WoW. It happens when you run world of warcraft in wine (or winex, or cedega, or whatever you want to call it.) on a linux machine.

You obviously have an axe to grind, but don't make up your own facts. This is a legitimate pop-up.

I hereby invalidate your post. Better luck next time.

I am an optimist. I prefer to think of that cyphered WoW EULA as yet another challenge provided by the game that is to be solved by the dedicated player!

Ironically, captcha = quake

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 12:37 • by Nerd Blocker (unregistered)
112163 in reply to 112151
Whiner, whiner, whiner

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 12:53 • by nobody (unregistered)
I've seen bags of peanuts (ingredients: peanuts, peanut oil, salt) with the warning
"WARNING May contain trace amounts of peanuts and other tree nuts"

I certainly hope there are more than trace amounts in the bag!

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 13:04 • by gwenhwyfaer
112172 in reply to 112146
Mark:
The raisin one is FAKE!


Tell you what - tomorrow I'll nip down to Atkinson's of Sheffield (which has a Julian Graves substore in it), and I'll take a look, and I'll let you know whether I find raisins with SQL on them. If so, I might even take a photo of a bag.

...And then you'll accuse me of being a liar as well, no doubt, on equally flimsy grounds...

Hint: if I centre the string " This needs centring.", it's going to look off-centre isn't it?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 13:07 • by greyfade
I saw that WoW EULA the other day while installing Burning Crusade... In Wine. I had thought it was a Wine bug at the time. But perhaps it's actually corrupted on the released discs?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 13:08 • by Ghost (unregistered)
112176 in reply to 112169
I've seen bags of peanuts (ingredients: peanuts, peanut oil, salt) with the warning
"WARNING May contain trace amounts of peanuts and other tree nuts"

I certainly hope there are more than trace amounts in the bag!


Truely one of those wonko the sane moments.

Of course one of my favorite is the mixed nuts container, which as the obligatory warning, but also as a bit of marketing: "Contains less than 50% peanuts" ... Yeah, I think something like 49% peanuts. Makes the claim nice and legal, but still skimps on the good stuff.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 13:32 • by Steve (unregistered)
Re: "The irony in this last message (sent in by John) is that it was received via interoffice mail and is a photocopy of a fax of a printed screenshot."

What!? no Wood Table! deny the request to fix until there is a scan, with wood table. unacceptable!

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 13:33 • by Johnie (unregistered)
I wonder if it is possible to do a SQL injection hack with the peanuts.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 13:36 • by skot123 (unregistered)
112182 in reply to 112172
I love the raisin one… but since it is a SELECT * FROM WHERE clause wouldn’t the response also include the Equipment ID?

If you do find them at the store, pick one up and put it up on ebay…it would make a great addition to my cubical shaped prison.

captcha -- burned

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 14:07 • by Ash (unregistered)
At that price (the Tiger Direct wtf,) all you'd need is one sale...

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 14:19 • by dustin (unregistered)
112191 in reply to 112119
I work at the chocolate coated raisin factory. This is what I'm going to type in tommorrow when we need to do a new batch of peanutes.

SELECT * FROM [Equipment Table] WHERE [Equipment ID] = 4; DROP TABLE [Equipment Table];

I always hated how we included the word table in [Equipment Table]

captcha: howdy.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 14:22 • by Volmarias
112192 in reply to 112188
I sent the raisin pic to our DBA, who doesn't frequent TDWTF. His response:

The DBA:
I approve.

I always thought it's a good idea to display the SQL along with the report, just to make clear what the report means.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 14:33 • by jeb (unregistered)
112198 in reply to 112141
Sgt. Zim:

My favorite was the frozen entreé of "Thai-style Peanut Chicken (in Peanut Sauce)" ... Which included the warning that it was produced on machines that "also process peanuts".

I'll have to find another one of those, put it on a wooden table, photograph it, and submit it as a sidebar...
I keep kosher, so I'm always checking the ingredients for things that are vegetarian to see what's disqualifying them (usually gelatin or something). There's a Thai curry mix that goes on and on about how it's MEAT FREE! and VEGETARIANS OK! I look at the ingredients and the first one is lard, the second one is chicken fat. I guess if it's all dissolved it doesn't count as meat.

//Again with the prescient CAPTCHA: ewww.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 15:27 • by Steamer2k (unregistered)
That screen resolution reminds me of Steven Seagal's Letterbox 2000: http://youtube.com/watch?v=d82j_Qfp_VA

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 15:34 • by WWWWolf
112204 in reply to 112148
wolfy:
I mean, who really cares how many *percent* of the users are administrators? Or is it some kind of competition?


I don't know, it's usually just a small interesting factoid. In some wikis, it's considered a metric of how many admins are needed. en.wikipedia.org has 3,283,740 users and 1,090 admins, which works out to roughly 1 admin per 3000 users, and we're so far doing pretty much fine... I think someone was doing some comparisons based on that data.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 15:35 • by Zylon (unregistered)
112205 in reply to 112119
Owen Rudge:
I find the juxtaposition of the "retard" word and the little disability icon somewhat ironic...

For the love of god, when did people start confusing "irony" with "coincidence"? Irony is founded on opposites. Typing something like "acrobatic" next to a disabled icon would be (vaguely) ironic. "Retard" would not.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 15:50 • by Dougal Matthews (unregistered)
112210 in reply to 112157
brazzy:
Saladin:
Regarding the raisins WTF, that's probably the funniest one I've ever seen -- actually making it into the real world in a form other than a messed-up computer readout or web site misprint. Classic. It's my wallpaper for now.

Yesterday's caricatures are today's reality:

The text on they guy's back reads "Error: could not find file 'dragonhead.jpg'"


Haha, quality picture. Loved that article too. very funny.

Dougal
----------
www.dougalmatthews.com

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 16:23 • by Troy McClure (unregistered)
112220 in reply to 112192
Volmarias:
I sent the raisin pic to our DBA, who doesn't frequent TDWTF. His response:

The DBA:
I approve.

I always thought it's a good idea to display the SQL along with the report, just to make clear what the report means.


Your dba sounds pretty cool. I think thats one of the funniest things I've seen in a while. Of course I'm easily amused but still.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 16:55 • by AWG (unregistered)
Am I the only one who finds the "no rebates" part of the tax one amusing?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 17:15 • by Roberto Succo (unregistered)
lame
http://www.trendio.com

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 17:31 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
112235 in reply to 112205
That'd only be a coincidence if the only form of disablement was related to mental health.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 17:58 • by its me
112237 in reply to 112169
nobody:
I've seen bags of peanuts (ingredients: peanuts, peanut oil, salt) with the warning
"WARNING May contain trace amounts of peanuts and other tree nuts"

I certainly hope there are more than trace amounts in the bag!


Other tree nuts??? Since when do peanuts grow on a tree? Hell, they're not even nuts, they're legumes....

-Me

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 18:17 • by VGR
112241 in reply to 112146
Mark:
The raisin one is FAKE!
Every other line on the bag is perfectly centered. The SQL one is about 2 characters to the right. Even if this were to happen, the text would still be centered. Photoshop anyone?

It's far more likely that each line of text is manually indented with spaces, instead of being centered by some word processing or typesetting software.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 18:26 • by Scet (unregistered)
Tiger Direct must be shipping from its Mars warehouse at that price.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 18:35 • by domukun367 (unregistered)
112245 in reply to 112198
jeb:
I keep kosher, so I'm always checking the ingredients for things that are vegetarian to see what's disqualifying them (usually gelatin or something). There's a Thai curry mix that goes on and on about how it's MEAT FREE! and VEGETARIANS OK! I look at the ingredients and the first one is lard, the second one is chicken fat. I guess if it's all dissolved it doesn't count as meat.


I'm reminded of yesterday's MENSA boss:

I keep KOSHER, so I'm always checking the ingredients for things that are vegetarian to see what's disqualifying them (usually gelatin or something) from being KOSHER. I'm KOSHER and there's a Thai curry mix that goes on and on about how it's MEAT FREE! and VEGETARIANS OK! KOSHER. I look at the (KOSHER) ingredients and the first one is lard, the second one is chicken fat. I guess if it's all dissolved it doesn't count as meat. KOSHER.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 18:44 • by Shii (unregistered)
Hey, considering the fact that the error message says the server cannot be reached, is it possible that the "Send Report" button wasn't working?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 18:54 • by tin
112248 in reply to 112141
Sgt. Zim:
My favorite was the frozen entreé of "Thai-style Peanut Chicken (in Peanut Sauce)" ... Which included the warning that it was produced on machines that "also process peanuts".


Peanut M&Ms in Australia used to have the warning that they may contain nuts. I can't remember the exact wording, but I always laughed. It was probably well more than 5 years ago now.

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 20:16 • by NoneRightNow (unregistered)
112263 in reply to 112237
Everytime I think of that, I think of the Third Rock From the Sun episode when John Lithgows character goes out with Laurie Metcalf's character (a vegan). And he first thinks her comment humorous, at first...

Captcha: muhahaha How does it know?

Re: Chocolate Covered SQL

2007-01-18 21:00 • by chrismcb
I'm going to guess that the Send Report actually does a lot more, like maybe send everything in the scroll box.

I guess the user could have take a picture of the screen. Placed it on the wooden table. Scrolled, taken another picture of the screen, placed it on the table...
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment